@@@@@ @   @ @@@@@    @     @ @@@@@@@   @       @  @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@
         @   @   @ @        @ @ @ @    @       @     @   @   @   @   @  @
         @   @@@@@ @@@@     @  @  @    @        @   @    @   @   @   @   @
         @   @   @ @        @     @    @         @ @     @   @   @   @  @
         @   @   @ @@@@@    @     @    @          @      @@@@@ @@@@@ @@@

                        Mt. Holz Science Fiction Society
                    Club Notice - 06/18/99 -- Vol. 17, No. 51

       Chair/Librarian: Mark Leeper, 732-817-5619, mleeper@lucent.com
       Factotum: Evelyn Leeper, 732-332-6218, eleeper@lucent.com
       Distinguished Heinlein Apologist: Rob Mitchell, robmitchell@lucent.com
       HO Chair Emeritus: John Jetzt, jetzt@lucent.com
       HO Librarian Emeritus: Nick Sauer, njs@lucent.com
       Back issues at http://www.geocities.com/Athens/4824
       All material copyright by author unless otherwise noted.

       The Science Fiction Association of Bergen County meets on the
       second Saturday of every month in Upper Saddle River; call
       201-447-3652 for details.  The Denver Area Science Fiction
       Association meets 7:30 PM on the third Saturday of every month at
       Southwest State Bank, 1380 S. Federal Blvd.

       ===================================================================

       1.  The sequel to BABYLON 5,  has  begun.   CRUSADER  runs  on  TNT
       Wednesday  nights at 10pm EDT and is repeated Monday nights at 11pm
       EDT.   It  is  too  early  to  tell,  but  this  one   may   be   a
       disappointment.   It  looks like a variation on STAR TREK: VOYAGER,
       but done with J. Michael Straczynski's hard-edged dialog, but using
       it  before  he  has  established the characters just makes it sound
       melodramatic.  "Just so we're clear--once we go this is my command.
       I'll  do  whatever's  necessary.   If that means turning the entire
       galaxy upside-down and shaking its pockets to see what  falls  out,
       that's what I'll do.  I'm not subtle, I'm not pretty, and I'll piss
       off a lot of people along the way.  But I'll  get  the  job  done."
       Wow!  [-mrl]

       ===================================================================

       2. A formatting problem last week caused the following sentence  in
       Mark Leeper's article on museums to be truncated:

       You would be surprised how many museums  and  national  parks  have
       souvenir shops selling things labeled like .79 cents.  It is not 79
       cents or $.79, but .79 cents.

       ===================================================================

       3. In Joe Karpierz's review of DARWINIA last  week,  the  sentence,
       "Turns  out  that our Guilford Law is the real Guilford Law" should
       have read, "Turns out that our  Guilford  Law  is  *NOT*  the  real
       Guilford Law."  [-jk]

       ===================================================================

       4. They are talking on the  radio  about  a  new  law  REQUIRING  a
       teenager  to  get  permission  from a parent to get an abortion.  I
       wanted just to say I think these blanket laws are absurd.  I  think
       at least the males should be exempted.  What's the point of forcing
       them to get permission they will never use?  [-mrl]

       ===================================================================

       5.  Last week I was discussing the old and not very  good  dinosaur
       exhibit  at  the  American  Museum  of Natural History and how they
       knowingly spread misinformation about dinosaurs.

       Well, finally the dinosaur halls opened again, but getting back  to
       the  museum  was  not  my  top priority.  I finally went back a few
       weeks ago and several years later.  Hey, man, the snit is OVER.  If
       you  have  not  been  to  a museum since you were a kid, you should
       realize that the computer has forever changed museums.  And  is  it
       ever  for  the  better!   You  have corporations whose job it is to
       design new exhibits and in the age of the computer, do they ever do
       a good job!  It is a whole new ballgame.  You used to see specimens
       placed there and a few paragraphs about  them.   Everyone  who  was
       interested  read  the  same paragraphs.  And if you went to another
       museum you saw basically the  same  exhibit,  just  with  different
       specimens.

       Computers these days make what is conceivably  thousands  of  times
       the  amount of information available to the visitor and the visitor
       can choose what information interests him or her.  So if  you  want
       to  just  gawk at the specimens, you can still do that.  But if you
       want to learn something there is a wealth of  information  at  your
       fingertips.   This exhibit has had a marvelously creative idea that
       I would suspect other museums would want to copy.  The whole fourth
       floor  is  devoted to vertebrate evolution.  The ordering is not by
       years but by what are called clades.  Let me see if I  can  explain
       this.   You  have  the  whole  tree  of  vertebrate  life and every
       vertebrate is on it someplace.  There are  branches  of  the  tree.
       The first major branching is animals with jaws versus ones that did
       not have them.  The next is having four appendages, and  so  forth.
       Well  they  start  by  showing  you specimens of creatures with and
       without jaws.  Then they follow the jaw-line (so to speak) and next
       show  you  specimens  with jaws but not four legs, versus ones that
       did not.  Evelyn was talking about how useful having four legs were
       and  I  agreed,  "Oh,  yeah.   Four  legs  good."   And  with  each
       bifurcation the museum explores what evolved on one or on both sub-
       trees  coming  out  of the bifurcation.  Every few feet they have a
       computer terminal that allows you to see pictures of the animals on
       both  sides  of  the  evolution  and, if you want, to give a little
       lecture on the breakdown.  And at the same terminals you  can  pick
       "Tour"  and  have  a little movie of a museum guide pointing to the
       various specimens and telling you why they are interesting.  Oh, at
       one time you probably could rent a tape and get a one-size-fits-all
       tour.  But this had more information and  it  was  about  just  the
       subjects  that  interested  you.   And it was free to anyone in the
       gallery.

       Most terminals seemed to be working too, which is impressive.   You
       get the kids coming along and they do not care what the terminal is
       saying about science.  They just want to hit a button and  see  the
       computer  do  something.   Anything.   So  they  come along and are
       convinced  that  the  computer  has  a  scheduling  algorithm  that
       increases  the  priority  of an action based on how hard the button
       was pushed.  If you drive the button four  inches  into  the  base,
       that  will be considered to be a really high-priority button press.
       A doting father comes along, sees his kid bashing the controls  and
       holding  up  Evelyn's  and my education, and he says how these kids
       are really smarter than we ever were.  I look  at  the  father.   I
       look  at  the  kid.   I  look at the father.  I look at the kid.  I
       suppress the urge to say "Speak for yourself."  This kid should  be
       in a computer game arcade and not a science museum, but that is not
       the museum's fault.

       Anyway, since I wrote a previous editorial  complaining  about  the
       American  Museum  of Natural History, I felt I should update it and
       say all is now forgiven.  They do have a really  good  exhibit,  if
       that kid did not destroy it after I left.  [-mrl]

                                          Mark Leeper
                                          HO 1K-644 732-817-5619
                                          mleeper@lucent.com

            To knock a thing down, especially if it is cocked
            at an arrogant angle, is a deep delight of the blood.
                                          -- George Santayana


               THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT ALMOST BLANK